Gestión del dolor agudo postoperatorio: condiciones para garantizar la seguridad y la efectividad de los tratamientos analgésicos / Management of acute postoperative pain: Conditions to guarantee the safety and effectiveness of analgesic treatments

La evidencia sobre la gestión del dolor postoperatorio presenta un grado de calidad bajo o insuficiente. El Grupo de Trabajo del Dolor Agudo SEDAR ha elaborado este documento-guía para aplicar la mejor evidencia científica disponible a la práctica clínica habitual, individualizándolo en función de factores propios del paciente y del procedimiento, y englobando las distintas opciones organizativas del control de dolor.El documento profundiza y actualiza conceptos y requisitos mínimos necesarios para una analgesia óptima postoperatoria, el abordaje multidisciplinar y la gestión del dolor agudo postoperatorio. Se definen y se describen líneas estratégicas y los distintos modelos de gestión. Se establece un plan de actuación general perioperatoria basado en la colaboración con los servicios quirúrgicos implicados, en la revisión conjunta de la evidencia y en la elaboración de protocolos por procedimiento. Finalmente, se presenta un plan de seguimiento y los indicadores mínimos necesarios para un control de calidad del dolor postoperatorio. (AU)

The evidence on postoperative pain management is of low or insufficient quality. The SEDAR Acute Pain Working Group has prepared this guideline-document to apply the best available scientific evidence to clinical practice, individualizing it based on factors specific to the patient and the procedure, and encompassing different organizational options, attempting to individualize it based on specific factors of the patient and the procedure, and encompassing the different organizational options for pain control.The document updates concepts and minimum requirements necessary for optimal postoperative analgesia, a multidisciplinary approach and the management of acute postoperative pain. Strategic lines and different management models are defined. A general perioperative action plan is established based on collaboration with the surgical departments involved, on the joint review of the evidence and on preparation of protocols by the procedure. Finally, a follow-up plan and a series of minimum indicators necessary for quality control of postoperative pain are presented. (AU)

Influence of laparoscopic surgery on the outcomes of radical cystectomy within a multimodal rehabilitation protocol.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The implementation of Enhanced Recover After Surgery (ERAS) multimodal rehabilitation protocols in radical cystectomy has shown to improve outcomes in hospital stay and complications. The aim of this analysis is to evaluate the impact of laparoscopic surgery on radical cystectomy within a multimodal rehabilitation program. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was carried out in a third level center between 2011 and 2020 including patients with bladder cancer submitted to radical cystectomy according to an ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocol and the Spanish Multimodal Rehabilitation Group (GERM) with 20 items to be fulfilled. RESULTS: A total of 250 radical cystectomies were performed throughout the study period, 42.8% by open surgery (OS) and 57.2% by laparoscopic surgery (LS). The groups are comparable in demographic and clinical variables (p > 0.05). Operative time was longer in the LS group (248.4 ±â€¯55.0 vs. 286.2 ±â€¯51.9 min; p < 0.001). However, bleeding was significantly lower in the LS group (417.5 ±â€¯365.7 vs. 877.9 ±â€¯529.7 cc; p < 0.001), as was the need for blood transfusion (33.6% vs. 58.9%; p < 0.001). Postoperative length of stay (11.5 ±â€¯10.5 vs. 20.1 ±â€¯17.2 days; p < 0.001), total and major complications were also significantly lower in this group (LS). The readmission rate was lower in the LS group but not significantly (36.4% vs. 29.4%; p = 0.237). The difference between 90-day mortality in both groups was not statistically significant (2.8% LS vs. 4.3% OS; p = 0.546). The differences were maintained in the multivariate models. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery within a multimodal rehabilitation program increases operative time but significantly decreases intraoperative bleeding, transfusion requirements, postoperative length of stay, and complications.

Management of acute postoperative pain: Conditions to guarantee the safety and effectiveness of analgesic treatments.

The evidence on postoperative pain management is of low or insufficient quality. The SEDAR Acute Pain Working Group has prepared this guideline-document to apply the best available scientific evidence to clinical practice, individualizing it based on factors specific to the patient and the procedure, and encompassing different organizational options, attempting to individualize it based on specific factors of the patient and the procedure, and encompassing the different organizational options for pain control. The document updates concepts and minimum requirements necessary for optimal postoperative analgesia, a multidisciplinary approach and the management of Acute Postoperative Pain. Strategic lines and different management models are defined. A general perioperative action plan is established based on collaboration with the surgical departments involved, on the joint review of the evidence and on preparation of protocols by the procedure. Finally, a follow-up plan and a series of minimum indicators necessary for quality control of postoperative pain are presented.

Evaluation of an enhanced recovery after lung surgery (ERALS) program in lung cancer lobectomy: An eight-year experience.

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced recovery after lung surgery (ERALS) protocols have proven useful in reducing postoperative stay (POS) and postoperative complications (POC). We studied the performance of an ERALS program for lung cancer lobectomy in our institution, aiming to identify which factors are associated with a reduction of POC and POS. METHODS: Analytic retrospective observational study conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital involving patients submitted to lobectomy for lung cancer and included in an ERALS program. Univariable and multivariable analysis were employed to identify factors associated with increased risk of POC and prolonged POS. RESULTS: A total 624 patients were enrolled in the ERALS program. The median POS was 4 days (range 1-63), with 2.9% of ICU postoperative admission. A videothoracoscopic approach was used in 66.6% of cases, and 174 patients (27.9%) experienced at least one POC. Perioperative mortality rate was 0.8% (5 cases). Mobilization to chair in the first 24h after surgery was achieved in 82.5% of cases, with 46.5% of patients achieving ambulation in the first 24h. Absence of mobilization to chair and preoperative FEV1% less than 60% predicted, were identified as independent risk factors for POC, while thoracotomy approach and the presence of POC predicted prolonged POS. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a reduction in ICU admissions and POS contemporaneous with the use of an ERALS program in our institution. We demonstrated that early mobilization and videothoracoscopic approach are modifiable independent predictors of reduced POC and POS, respectively.

Evaluation of an enhanced recovery after lung surgery (ERALS) program in lung cancer lobectomy: An eight-year experience / Evaluación de un programa de rehabilitación multimodal en lobectomía por cáncer de pulmón: experiencia de 8 años

Introduction: Enhanced recovery after lung surgery (ERALS) protocols have proven useful in reducing postoperative stay (POS) and postoperative complications (POC). We studied the performance of an ERALS program for lung cancer lobectomy in our institution, aiming to identify which factors are associated with a reduction of POC and POS. Methods: Analytic retrospective observational study conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital involving patients submitted to lobectomy for lung cancer and included in an ERALS program. Univariable and multivariable analysis were employed to identify factors associated with increased risk of POC and prolonged POS. Results: A total 624 patients were enrolled in the ERALS program. The median POS was 4 days (range 1–63), with 2.9% of ICU postoperative admission. A videothoracoscopic approach was used in 66.6% of cases, and 174 patients (27.9%) experienced at least one POC. Perioperative mortality rate was 0.8% (5 cases). Mobilization to chair in the first 24h after surgery was achieved in 82.5% of cases, with 46.5% of patients achieving ambulation in the first 24h. Absence of mobilization to chair and preoperative FEV1% less than 60% predicted, were identified as independent risk factors for POC, while thoracotomy approach and the presence of POC predicted prolonged POS. Conclusions: We observed a reduction in ICU admissions and POS contemporaneous with the use of an ERALS program in our institution. We demonstrated that early mobilization and videothoracoscopic approach are modifiable independent predictors of reduced POC and POS, respectively. (AU)

Introducción: Los programas de recuperación intensificada en cirugía de pulmón (por sus siglas en inglés, ERALS) han demostrado ser útiles para reducir la estancia hospitalaria y las complicaciones postoperatorias. Estudiamos los resultados de la aplicación de un programa ERALS para lobectomía por cáncer en nuestro centro con la intención de identificar aquellos factores que se relacionan con la reducción de las complicaciones y la estancia. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo en pacientes sometidos a lobectomía por cáncer de pulmón e incluidos en un programa ERALS. Se empleó análisis univariable y multivariable para identificar los factores de riesgo de complicaciones y estancia prolongada. Resultados: Un total de 624 pacientes se inscribieron en el programa ERALS. La estancia postoperatoria mediana fue de 4 días (1-63), con una tasa de ingreso en la UCI del 2,9%. El abordaje videotoracoscópico fue empleado en el 66,6% de los casos, y la tasa de complicaciones postoperatorias fue del 27,9%, con una tasa de mortalidad del 0,8% (5 casos). La no movilización en las primeras 24h, y el FEV1% inferior al 60% del previsto, se identificaron como factores de riesgo de complicaciones; mientras que el abordaje mediante toracotomía y la presencia de complicaciones predijeron la estancia prolongada. Conclusiones: Observamos una reducción en la estancia hospitalaria y en los ingresos postoperatorios en la UCI concomitante a la puesta en marcha de un programa ERALS en nuestro centro. La movilización precoz y el abordaje quirúrgico videotoracoscópico demostraron ser predictores independientes y modificables para la reducción de las complicaciones y para la duración de la estancia, respectivamente. (AU)

Recommendations of the Society of Thoracic Surgery and the Section of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery of the Spanish Society of Anesthesia, Resuscitation and Pain Therapy, for patients undergoing lung surgery included in an intensified recovery program.

In recent years, multidisciplinary programs have been implemented that include different actions during the pre, intra and postoperative period, aimed at reducing perioperative stress and therefore improving the results of patients undergoing surgical interventions. Initially, these programs were developed for colorectal surgery and from there they have been extended to other surgeries. Thoracic surgery, considered highly complex, like other surgeries with a high postoperative morbidity and mortality rate, may be one of the specialties that most benefit from the implementation of these programs. This review presents the recommendations made by different specialties involved in the perioperative care of patients who require resection of a lung tumor. Meta-analyzes, systematic reviews, randomized and non-randomized controlled studies, and retrospective studies conducted in patients undergoing this type of intervention have been taken into account in preparing the recommendations presented in this guide. The GRADE scale has been used to classify the recommendations, assessing on the one hand the level of evidence published on each specific aspect and, on the other hand, the strength of the recommendation with which the authors propose its application. The recommendations considered most important for this type of surgery are those that refer to pre-habilitation, minimization of surgical aggression, excellence in the management of perioperative pain and postoperative care aimed at providing rapid postoperative rehabilitation.

Recomendaciones de la Sociedad Española de Cirugía Torácica y de la Sección de Cardiotorácica y Cirugía Vascular de la Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, para los pacientes sometidos a cirugía pulmonar incluidos en un programa de recuperación intensificada / Recommendations of the Society of Thoracic Surgery and the Section of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery of the Spanish Society of Anesthesia, Resuscitation and Pain Therapy, for patients undergoing lung surgery included in an intensified recovery program

En los últimos años se están implementando programas multidisciplinares que incluyen diferentes actuaciones durante el periodo pre, intra y postoperatorio, encaminadas a disminuir el estrés perioperatorio y, por tanto, a mejorar los resultados de los pacientes sometidos a intervenciones quirúrgicas. Inicialmente, estos programas se desarrollaron para cirugía colorrectal y de ahí se han ido extendiendo a otras cirugías. La cirugía torácica, considerada de elevada complejidad, al igual que otras cirugías con una alta tasa de morbimortalidad postoperatoria, puede ser una de las especialidades que más se beneficien de la implantación de estos programas. En esta revisión se presentan las recomendaciones elaboradas por diferentes especialidades implicadas en los cuidados perioperatorios de los pacientes que requieren la resección de un tumor pulmonar. Para la elaboración de las recomendaciones presentadas en esta guía se han tenido en cuenta los metaanálisis, las revisiones sistemáticas, los estudios controlados aleatorizados y no aleatorizados y los estudios retrospectivos realizados en pacientes sometidos a este tipo de intervenciones. Para la clasificación de las recomendaciones se ha empleado la escala GRADE, valorando, por un lado, el nivel de evidencia publicado sobre cada aspecto concreto, y por otro, la fuerza de la recomendación con la que los autores proponen su aplicación. Las recomendaciones consideradas más importantes para este tipo de cirugía son las que se refieren a la prehabilitación, a la minimización de la agresión quirúrgica, a la excelencia en el manejo del dolor perioperatorio y a los cuidados postoperatorios encaminados a proporcionar una rápida rehabilitación postoperatoria.(AU)

In recent years, multidisciplinary programs have been implemented that include different actions during the pre, intra and postoperative period, aimed at reducing perioperative stress and therefore improving the results of patients undergoing surgical interventions. Initially, these programs were developed for colorectal surgery and from there they have been extended to other surgeries. Thoracic surgery, considered highly complex, like other surgeries with a high postoperative morbidity and mortality rate, may be one of the specialties that most benefit from the implementation of these programs. This review presents the recommendations made by different specialties involved in the perioperative care of patients who require resection of a lung tumor. Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomized and non-randomized controlled studies, and retrospective studies conducted in patients undergoing this type of intervention have been taken into account in preparing the recommendations presented in this guide. The GRADE scale has been used to classify the recommendations, assessing on the one hand the level of evidence published on each specific aspect and, on the other hand, the strength of the recommendation with which the authors propose its application. The recommendations considered most important for this type of surgery are those that refer to pre-habilitation, minimization of surgical aggression, excellence in the management of perioperative pain and postoperative care aimed at providing rapid postoperative rehabilitation.(AU)

Thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk in bariatric surgery with multimodal rehabilitation programs comparing 2 reduced guidelines for pharmacological prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk in bariatric surgery with multimodal rehabilitation programs, comparing two guidelines of pharmacological prophylaxis recommended in the Guide to the Spanish Society for Obesity Surgery and the Obesity Section of the AEC. METHODS: Cohorts retrospective study from January-2010 to December-2019. Cases of vertical gastrectomy or gastric bypass were recorded, systematically applying multimodal rehabilitation protocols. Two reduced chemoprophylaxis regimens were analyzed, starting after surgery and maintained for 10 days; one with fondaparinux (Arixtra®) at a fixed dose of 2.5mg/day and the other with enoxaparin (Clexane®) with a single daily dose adjusted to BMI: 40mg/day for BMI of 35-40 and 60mg/day for BMI 40-60. RESULTS: 675 patients were included; 354 with Fondaparinux-Arixtra® during the period 2010-2015 and 321 with Enoxaparin-Clexane® during the period 2016-2019. There were no cases of DVT or clinical PE. However, the incidence of hemorrhage requiring reoperation, transfusion, or a decrease of more than 3g/dL hemoglobin was 4.7%, with no difference between groups. Mortality was nil. The average stay was 2.8 days and the outpatient follow-up was 100% during the first 6 months and 95% at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of multimodal rehabilitation programs and mechanical and pharmacological thromboprophylaxis by experienced teams, reduces the risk of thromboembolic events and could justify reduced chemoprophylaxis regimens to decrease the risk of postoperative bleeding.

Riesgo trombótico y hemorrágico en cirugía bariátrica con programas de rehabilitación multimodal comparando 2 pautas reducidas de profilaxis farmacológica / Thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk in bariatric surgery with multimodal rehabilitation programs comparing 2 reduced guidelines for pharmacological prophylaxis

Objetivo: Determinar el riesgo trombótico y hemorrágico en la cirugía bariátrica con programas de rehabilitación multimodal, comparando 2pautas de profilaxis farmacológica recomendadas en la Guía de la Sociedad Española de Cirugía de Obesidad y la Sección de Obesidad de la Asociación Española de Cirujanos. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de cohortes desde enero del 2010 hasta diciembre del 2019. Se registraron los casos de gastrectomía vertical o bypass gástrico, aplicando sistemáticamente protocolos de rehabilitación multimodal. Se analizaron 2 pautas reducidas de quimioprofilaxis, de inicio tras la cirugía y mantenida durante 10 días; uno con fondaparinux (Arixtra®) a dosis fija de 2,5mg/día y otro con enoxaparina (Clexane®) con dosis única diaria ajustada al IMC: 40mg/día para IMC de 35-40 y 60mg/día para IMC de 40-60.ResultadosSe incluyó a 675 pacientes; 354 con fondaparinux-Arixtra® durante el periodo 2010-2015 y 321 con enoxaparina-Clexane® durante el periodo 2016-2019. No hubo ningún caso de TVP o TEP clínico. No obstante, la incidencia de hemorragia con necesidad de una reoperación, trasfusión o con un descenso de más de 3g/dl de hemoglobina fue del 4,7%, sin diferencias entre los grupos. La mortalidad fue nula. La estancia media fue de 2,8 días y el seguimiento ambulatorio fue del 100% durante los primeros 6 meses y del 95% a los 12 meses. Conclusiones: La combinación de programas de rehabilitación multimodal y tromboprofilaxis mecánica y farmacológica por equipos experimentados, reduce el riesgo de eventos tromboembólicos y podría justificar las pautas reducidas de quimioprofilaxis para disminuir el riesgo de una hemorragia postoperatoria (AU)

Objective: to determine the thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk in bariatric surgery with multimodal rehabilitation programs, comparing 2guidelines of pharmacological prophylaxis recommended in the Guide to the Spanish Society for Obesity Surgery and the Obesity Section of the AEC. Methods: Cohorts retrospective study from January-2010 to December-2019. Cases of vertical gastrectomy or gastric bypass were recorded, systematically applying multimodal rehabilitation protocols. Two reduced chemoprophylaxis regimens were analyzed, starting after surgery and maintained for 10 days; one with fondaparinux (Arixtra®) at a fixed dose of 2.5mg / day and the other with enoxaparin (Clexane®) with a single daily dose adjusted to BMI: 40mg / day for BMI of 35-40 and 60mg/day for BMI 40-60. Results: 675 patients were included; 354 with Fondaparinux-Arixtra® during the period 2010-2015 and 321 with Enoxaparin-Clexane® during the period 2016-2019. There were no cases of DVT or clinical PE. However, the incidence of hemorrhage requiring reoperation, transfusion, or a decrease of more than 3g / dL hemoglobin was 4.7%, with no difference between groups. Mortality was nil. The average stay was 2.8 days and the outpatient follow-up was 100% during the first 6 months and 95% at 12 months. Conclusions: The combination of multimodal rehabilitation programs and mechanical and pharmacological thromboprophylaxis by experienced teams, reduces the risk of thromboembolic events and could justify reduced chemoprophylaxis regimens to decrease the risk of postoperative bleeding.

Recommendations of the Society of Thoracic Surgery and the Section of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery of the Spanish Society of Anesthesia, Resuscitation and Pain Therapy, for patients undergoing lung surgery included in an intensified recovery program. / Recomendaciones de la Sociedad Española de Cirugía Torácica y de la Sección de Cardiotorácica y Cirugía Vascular de la Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, para los pacientes sometidos a cirugía pulmonar incluidos en un programa de recuperación intensificada.

In recent years, multidisciplinary programs have been implemented that include different actions during the pre, intra and postoperative period, aimed at reducing perioperative stress and therefore improving the results of patients undergoing surgical interventions. Initially, these programs were developed for colorectal surgery and from there they have been extended to other surgeries. Thoracic surgery, considered highly complex, like other surgeries with a high postoperative morbidity and mortality rate, may be one of the specialties that most benefit from the implementation of these programs. This review presents the recommendations made by different specialties involved in the perioperative care of patients who require resection of a lung tumor. Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomized and non-randomized controlled studies, and retrospective studies conducted in patients undergoing this type of intervention have been taken into account in preparing the recommendations presented in this guide. The GRADE scale has been used to classify the recommendations, assessing on the one hand the level of evidence published on each specific aspect and, on the other hand, the strength of the recommendation with which the authors propose its application. The recommendations considered most important for this type of surgery are those that refer to pre-habilitation, minimization of surgical aggression, excellence in the management of perioperative pain and postoperative care aimed at providing rapid postoperative rehabilitation.

Esofaguectomía «tubeless»: menos es más / “Tubeless” esophagectomy: Less is more

La cirugía del cáncer de esófago es un procedimiento complejo con tasas de morbimortalidad elevadas, por lo que para obtener resultados adecuados se precisa de centros experimentados, un completo soporte multidisciplinar y vías clínicas adecuadas. Se describe la experiencia inicial y la técnica de la esofaguectomía «tubeless» en la que tras realizar una resección esofágica y linfadenectomía mediastínica extendida, al final del procedimiento no son colocados drenajes ni sondas de ningún tipo, con el fin de disminuir la agresividad del mismo, mejorar el bienestar postoperatorio y acelerar la recuperación funcional del paciente. (AU)

The esophageal cancer surgery is a complex procedure with elevated rates of both morbidity and mortality, which is why, in order to achieve adequate results, it should be performed in high volume centers, where complete multidisciplinary support is available and recent clinical guidelines are applied. We describe the initial experience and the technique of “tubeless” esophagectomy where esophageal resection and mediastinal lymphadenectomy are performed and no drains nor tubes of any kind are placed, with the aim to decrease the level of surgical aggression, enhance the postoperative comfort and accelerate the patient́s recovery. (AU)

"Tubeless" esophagectomy: Less is more.

The esophageal cancer surgery is a complex procedure with elevated rates of both morbidity and mortality, which is why, in order to achieve adequate results, it should be performed in high volume centers, where complete multidisciplinary support is available and recent clinical guidelines are applied. We describe the initial experience and the technique of "tubeless" esophagectomy where esophageal resection and mediastinal lymphadenectomy are performed and no drains nor tubes of any kind are placed, with the aim to decrease the level of surgical aggression, enhance the postoperative comfort and accelerate the patient́s recovery.

Rehabilitación multimodal en cirugía de urgencias: ¿utopía o realidad? / Enhanced Recovery After Emergency Surgery: Utopia or Reality?

La rehabilitación multimodal quirúrgica (ERAS) constituye la aplicación de una serie de medidas perioperatorias basadas en la evidencia, con el fin de lograr una mejor recuperación del paciente y una disminución de las complicaciones y la mortalidad. Estos programas de rehabilitación multimodal inicialmente demostraron sus ventajas en el ámbito de la cirugía colorrectal siendo adoptados progresivamente por otras áreas quirúrgicas dentro de la cirugía general y por otras especialidades quirúrgicas. El factor excluyente principal para la aplicación de este tipo de programas ha sido la presentación clínica urgente, lo que ha provocado que a pesar del gran volumen de literatura existente sobre ERAS en cirugía electiva, existan pocos estudios que hayan investigado la efectividad de estos programas en pacientes quirúrgicos en urgencias. El objetivo de este artículo es mostrar las medidas de recuperación intensificada de que disponemos en la actualidad según la evidencia existente para cirugía urgente. (AU)

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) constitutes the application of a series of perioperative measures based on the evidence, in order to achieve a better recovery of the patient and a decrease of the complications and the mortality. These ERAS programs initially proved their advantages in the field of colorectal surgery being progressively adopted by other surgical areas within the general surgery and other surgical specialties. The main excluding factor for the application of such programs has been the urgent clinical presentation, which has caused that despite the large volume of existing literature on ERAS in elective surgery, there are few studies that have investigated the effectiveness of these programs in surgical patients in emergencies. The aim of this article is to show ERAS measures currently available according to the existing evidence for emergency surgery. (AU)

Thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk in bariatric surgery with multimodal rehabilitation programs comparing 2 reduced guidelines for pharmacological prophylaxis. / Riesgo trombótico y hemorrágico en cirugía bariátrica con programas de rehabilitación multimodal comparando 2 pautas reducidas de profilaxis farmacológica.

OBJECTIVE: to determine the thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk in bariatric surgery with multimodal rehabilitation programs, comparing 2guidelines of pharmacological prophylaxis recommended in the Guide to the Spanish Society for Obesity Surgery and the Obesity Section of the AEC. METHODS: Cohorts retrospective study from January-2010 to December-2019. Cases of vertical gastrectomy or gastric bypass were recorded, systematically applying multimodal rehabilitation protocols. Two reduced chemoprophylaxis regimens were analyzed, starting after surgery and maintained for 10 days; one with fondaparinux (Arixtra®) at a fixed dose of 2.5mg / day and the other with enoxaparin (Clexane®) with a single daily dose adjusted to BMI: 40mg / day for BMI of 35-40 and 60mg/day for BMI 40-60. RESULTS: 675 patients were included; 354 with Fondaparinux-Arixtra® during the period 2010-2015 and 321 with Enoxaparin-Clexane® during the period 2016-2019. There were no cases of DVT or clinical PE. However, the incidence of hemorrhage requiring reoperation, transfusion, or a decrease of more than 3g / dL hemoglobin was 4.7%, with no difference between groups. Mortality was nil. The average stay was 2.8 days and the outpatient follow-up was 100% during the first 6 months and 95% at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of multimodal rehabilitation programs and mechanical and pharmacological thromboprophylaxis by experienced teams, reduces the risk of thromboembolic events and could justify reduced chemoprophylaxis regimens to decrease the risk of postoperative bleeding.

Enhanced Recovery After Emergency Surgery: Utopia or Reality? / Rehabilitación multimodal en cirugía de urgencias: ¿utopía o realidad?

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) constitutes the application of a series of perioperative measures based on the evidence, in order to achieve a better recovery of the patient and a decrease of the complications and the mortality. These ERAS programs initially proved their advantages in the field of colorectal surgery being progressively adopted by other surgical areas within the general surgery and other surgical specialties. The main excluding factor for the application of such programs has been the urgent clinical presentation, which has caused that despite the large volume of existing literature on ERAS in elective surgery, there are few studies that have investigated the effectiveness of these programs in surgical patients in emergencies. The aim of this article is to show ERAS measures currently available according to the existing evidence for emergency surgery.

ERAS protocol compliance impact on functional recovery in colorectal surgery. / Impacto del grado de cumplimiento de un protocolo ERAS en la recuperación funcional después de cirugía colorrectal.

INTRODUCTION: Compliance to ERAS protocols is a process quality measure that is associated to better outcomes. The main objective of this study is to analyze the association between protocol compliance, surgical stress and functional recovery. The secondary objective is to identify independent factors associated to functional recovery. METHODS: A prospective observational single-centre study was performed. Patients who had scheduled colorectal surgery within an ERAS program from January 2017 to June 2018 were included. We analysed the relationship between protocol compliance percentage and surgical stress (defined by C reactive protein [CRP] blood levels on postoperative 3rd day), and functional recovery (defined by the proportion of patients who meet the discharge criteria on the 5th PO day or before). Multivariate analysis was performed to asses independent factor associated to functional recovery. RESULTS: 313 were included. For every additional percentage point of compliance to the protocol 3rd day C reactive protein plasmatic level decreases 1,46 mg/dL and increases 7% the probability to meet the discharge criteria (p < 0.001 both). Independent factors associated to functional recovery were ASA III-IV (OR 0.26; 0.14-0.48), surgical CR-POSSUM score (OR 0.68; 0.57-0.83), early mobilization (OR 4.22; 1.43-12.4) and removal of urinary catheter (OR 3.35; 1.79-6.27), p < 0,001 each of them. CONCLUSION: Better compliance to ERAS protocol in colorectal surgery decreases surgical stress and accelerates functional recovery.

Recuperación mejorada después de la cirugía: un cambio de paradigma en cuidados peri operatorios. Artículo de revisión / Enchanced recovery after surgry: a paradigm shift in perioperative care. Review article

La recuperación mejorada después de la cirugía (ERAS®) es un protocolo multimodal aplicado a la atención peri operatoria. Estos protocolos están implementados por un equipo multidisciplinario centrado en el paciente, incorporan personal clínico ambulatorio, enfermeras, anestesiólogos, personal de recuperación post operatoria, personal de nutrición, fisioterapeutas, trabajadores sociales y cirujanos. Independientemente de la subespecialidad quirúrgica, todos los protocolos ERAS® comparten los mismos objetivos: optimización pre operatoria del paciente, disminución del estrés peri operatorio, mantenimiento de la función fisiológica post operatoria y tiempo de recuperación acelerado después de la cirugía. Los protocolos ERAS® están diseñados para reducir la respuesta al estrés quirúrgico, facilitar el mantenimiento de la composición corporal y función orgánica para lograr una recuperación temprana(AU)

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) is a multimodal protocol applied to perioperative care. These protocols are implemented by a multidisciplinary patient-centered team, incorporating outpatient clinical staff, nurses, anesthesiologists, post-operative recovery staff, nutrition staff, physical therapists, social workers, and surgeons. Regardless of the surgical subspecialty, all ERAS® protocols share the same objectives: preoperative optimization of the patient, reduction of perioperative stress, maintenance of post-operative physiological function, and accelerated recovery time after surgery. ERAS® protocols are designed to reduce the response to surgical stress, facilitate the maintenance of body composition and organ function to achieve early recovery(AU)

Guía de práctica clínica de alta precoz en cirugía pediátrica / Fast Track Pediatric Surgery Guideline

En las últimas décadas se ha prestado mayor atención a los resultados de la actividad quirúrgica debido a factores económicos, la mejora de los cuidados perioperatorios y la preocupación por la calidad de la asistencia y satisfacción de la población. A este propósito han contribuido el desarrollo y aplicación de guías de práctica clínica. Estas guías reducen la variación en los cuidados del paciente quirúrgico, aumentan la eficiencia de dicho cuidado y proporcionan que los pacientes se beneficien de iniciativas institucionales encaminadas a mejorar la calidad de la asistencia sanitaria. La cirugía de alta precoz es un modelo de atención médico-quirúrgica encaminado a disminuir los costos de la atención médica mediante esfuerzos coordinados que permitan la reducción de la estancia hospitalaria en los pacientes, sin que ocurra incremento de complicaciones posoperatorias, ni insatisfacción de pacientes y familiares con el servicio prestado. Su empleo ha ido incrementándose en afecciones pediátricas. En el hospital pediátrico de Cienfuegos se aplica el modelo hace varios años y la guía fue aprobada en el Servicio de Cirugía Pediátrica en diciembre de 2018. Compartir esta guía mediante su publicación permitiría a otros servicios de cirugía pediátrica del país emplearla como referencia para la aplicación del modelo en sus propias instituciones y beneficiar a un mayor número de pacientes(AU)

In the last decades, there has been more attention on the results of the surgical activity due to economic factors, the improvement of perioperative cares and the concern on the quality of the care and the population´s satisfaction. The development and implementation of the clinical pratice´s guides had contributed to that purpose. These guides reduce the variations in the cares to the surgical patients, increase efficiency in that kind of care and foster that the patients are benefited with institutional initiatives addressed to improve health care quality. The Fast Track Pediatric Surgery is a model of medical-surgical care directed to lower the costs of medical care by means of coordinated efforts that allow the reduction of the hospital stay in patients without increasing the rates of postoperative complications, or dissatisfaction of the patients and relatives with the service given. The use of this procedure has been increasing in pediatric conditions. It has been implemented since some years ago in the Pediatric Hospital of Cienfuegos province, and the guide was approved in the Pediatric Surgery service in December, 2018.To share this guide by publishing it will be a way to allow other pediatric surgery services in the country to use it as a reference for the implementation of that model in their institutions and in that way to benefit a higher number of patients(AU)

Nasogastric tube utilization after esophagectomy: an unnecessary gesture? / Uso de sonda nasogástrica en pacientes sometidos a esofaguectomía: ¿Un gesto innecesario?

INTRODUCTION: Nasogastric decompressive tube utilization has been accepted as one of the basic perioperative care measures after esophageal resection surgery. However, with the development of multimodal rehabilitation programs and without clear evidence to support their use, the systematic indication of this measure may be controversial. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective, descriptive and comparative study of patients who had undergone Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in our center -from January 2015 to December 2018- with placement (Group S), or without placement (Group N) of a decompressive tube in gastroplasty during postoperative period. Epidemiological variables and differences between groups in post-surgical morbidity and mortality, hospital stay, onset of oral tolerance and the need for nasogastric tube placement were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients were included in this study, with a median age of 61 years, being 86% male. 46.5% were hypertensive, 25.5% had lung disease and 16.3% had diabetes mellitus. The median length of hospital stay was 9 days in group S versus 11.5 days in group N, with no differences in the onset of oral tolerance. Anastomotic dehiscence rate was 5% and 0% respectively. The overall mortality was 2.3% in the first 90 days, without differences between the groups. Placement of nasogastric tube during postoperative period was required only in 1 patient (4.3%) of the group N. CONCLUSIONS: Non-use of nasogastric tube during postoperative period of an Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy is a safe measure, as it is not associated with a higher rate of complications or hospital stay. This fact may be able to improve patients' comfort and postoperative recovery.

Enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery. / Rehabilitación multimodal en cirugía bariátrica.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are care programs based on scientific evidence and focused on postoperative recovery. They encompass all aspects of patient care and require multidisciplinary management, with the participation of diverse specialists. The implementation of these protocols is being extended to several abdominal and extra-abdominal surgeries, including bariatric approaches. Diverse specialists with wide experience in the management of morbidly obese patients have taken part in the working group that developed this protocol. A bibliographic search about ERAS in bariatric surgery in several databases was performed to evaluate the current scientific evidence, establishing evidence levels and recommendations according to the GRADE methodology. The items included in this protocol are separated into preoperative, perioperative and postoperative guidelines.